"If the UCC ends up arguing that North Carolina law must recognize gay marriage for the sake of the clergy’s religious freedom, then the church’s case hinges on the Constitution requiring the civil definition of marriage to conform to a religious definition. The UCC’s definition happens to be one that aligns with mainstream liberal values, but another church’s definition of marriage, of course, could be the opposite . . . To state the obvious, scripture simply has no place in how civil society defines the institution of civil marriage."
What are your thoughts?
Click here to read the full article.
What are your thoughts?
Click here to read the full article.